# Ad summary
This ad compares ALT. Crystal No. 23 perfume to Baccarat Rouge 540, noting their similar scents but different prices. The ad positions Crystal No. 23 as an affordable alternative that shares the same addictive, airy amber scent as the more expensive Baccarat Rouge 540, while also being vegan, clean, and cruelty-free.
# Brand positioning
ALT. is presented as a brand that offers affordable alternatives to luxury fragrances. The brand positions itself as a provider of high-quality scents without the premium price tag, suggesting that customers can enjoy the same addictive and airy amber scent as Baccarat Rouge 540 for a fraction of the cost. In addition to affordability, ALT. emphasizes ethical values by promoting its perfume as vegan, clean, and cruelty-free, appealing to consumers who prioritize these qualities in their purchasing decisions. The brand's positioning pushes against the industry norm of high-priced luxury fragrances by offering a cost-effective and ethical option.
# Product
The ALT. Crystal No. 23 perfume is presented as an affordable alternative to the luxury fragrance Baccarat Rouge 540. It is described as having the same addictive, airy amber scent. The product is marketed towards those who desire the high-end fragrance experience without the high-end price tag. The advertised price is $49, a significant discount compared to the competitor's $325 price. ALT. Crystal No. 23 is also highlighted as being vegan, clean, and cruelty-free, catering to ethically-conscious consumers. The ad aims to address the purchase barrier of high cost associated with luxury fragrances.
# Visual style
The ad features a clean and direct visual style with a focus on product comparison. The production quality is high, with well-lit product shots and a clear layout. The side-by-side comparison table is a key visual motif, designed to quickly communicate the value proposition. The typography is simple and legible, reinforcing the straightforward messaging. The overall style appears designed for easy scanning in-feed, prioritizing clarity and quick comprehension of the price comparison.
# Hooks
Headline: IF BACCARAT ROUGE 540 WASN'T $325 IT'D BE CALLED CRYSTAL NO. 23
# Benefits
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
# Features
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
- [object Object]
# Call to action
None used.
# Point of view
- [object Object]
# Storyline
- The ad starts by posing a hypothetical scenario: If Baccarat Rouge 540 wasn't $325, it would be called Crystal No. 23. This is intended to grab the viewer's attention by immediately addressing the high cost of the luxury perfume while introducing ALT.'s affordable alternative. The brand is clearly positioning Crystal No. 23 as a direct substitute for Baccarat Rouge 540 from the brand's perspective.
- The ad features side-by-side images of ALT. Crystal No. 23 and Baccarat Rouge 540, accompanied by a comparison chart. This visually reinforces the comparison between the two fragrances, highlighting their similar scents but drastically different prices. The brand is aiming to provide a clear side-by-side comparison.
- The comparison chart highlights that both perfumes have the same addictive, airy amber scent, but ALT. is priced at $49 instead of $325. Additionally, ALT. is emphasized to be vegan, clean, and cruelty-free. This part of the ad directly addresses cost concerns while also appealing to ethical consumers. The brand is presenting these features as key benefits that set ALT. apart.