Product Demo creative analysis ·10 min ·Recorded Dec 2024

Uncover creative trends

This video is a tutorial on how to use Motion's "Comparative Analysis" reports to uncover creative trends. The speaker demonstrates how to group ads based on various attributes (like format, creator, or naming conventions) to compare their performance holistically. This process allows users to make data-driven decisions about future creative direction by identifying what's working at a higher level.

What's discussed, in order

2 named frameworks

01 Comparative Analysis Report
A report type in Motion that allows users to compare the aggregated performance of multiple, custom-defined sets of creatives against one another.
presenter's own · ~01:17Play
02 Naming Convention with Identifiers
A structured approach to naming ads, ad sets, and campaigns using consistent prefixes (identifiers) to denote specific properties, which enables automated data parsing and grouping.
presenter's own · ~08:01Play

What's actually believed — in their own words

Diving into an individual ad is great... but what we also want to do is pull those holistic trends.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · opinion 00:22 #

Grouped views where we can decide what direction to lean into based on those results.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 00:33 #

Seeing those higher level insights can really guide us on what direction to take with what creatives to make and lean into.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 00:49 #

If you haven't yet watched the session on naming convention, I would recommend going there. It's going to give you that high level view of what to include within naming, which will then unlock how we can pull these different insights within Motion.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 00:57 #

Comparative reports... is going to allow you to pull those higher level grouped views of how does one group of ads do in comparison to another group.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 01:20 #

The line chart view is useful for seeing changes over a period of time, which can be interesting for spotting trends or seasonal changes.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 03:00 #

Anything within our naming conventions, essentially, we can start to create these groups to then pull those higher level views on how these different groups are doing in comparison to each other.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 05:07 #

Within your naming conventions, if you include identifiers, that's going to unlock a lot of automation.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 08:01 #

Using a consistent identifier allows the system to automatically find all values for that property.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 08:41 #

Automating reports with naming conventions keeps them up-to-date as you work with new influencers or test new concepts.

Speaker 1 · 2024 · observation 09:33 #

The do's and don'ts pulled from the session

Do this
  • Speaker 1: Use "Comparative Analysis" reports to uncover creative trends by comparing groups of ads. 01:17 #
  • Speaker 1: Group ads by format (e.g., Image vs. Video) to see which type performs better holistically. 01:37 #
  • Speaker 1: Swap metrics (e.g., from Impressions to ROAS or CPA) depending on your business goal (purchase-focused, app install-focused, etc.). 02:18 #
  • Speaker 1: Use the line chart view to spot trends and performance changes over time, adjusting the time frame to daily, weekly, or monthly. 02:57 #
  • Speaker 1: Group ads by creator name (using naming conventions) to compare the performance of different creators. 04:33 #
  • Speaker 1: Add multiple metrics like Thumbstop alongside ROAS to evaluate both attention and return performance. 05:16 #
  • Speaker 1: Drill down into a specific group's "ad breakdown" to see the individual top-performing ads within that group. 05:45 #
  • Speaker 1: Use global filters to add another layer of analysis to your comparative reports, such as looking only at prospecting campaigns. 07:17 #
  • Speaker 1: Use a consistent naming convention with identifiers (e.g., `i:` for influencer, `o:` for offer) to automate the grouping process in Motion. 08:01 #
  • Speaker 1: Set up naming convention properties in workspace settings to automatically parse your ad names based on your defined identifiers. 09:03 #
Don't do this
  • Speaker 1: Only analyzing individual ad performance without considering holistic, grouped trends. 00:28 #
  • Speaker 1: Manually creating groups for every analysis when you could automate the process. 08:05 #
  • Speaker 1: Drawing conclusions about a group without checking for anomalies (e.g., one ad with $100K spend dominating the data while the rest have $1K). 06:10 #

Numbers quoted in this talk

"Video... Spend ~$589K, ROAS 4.25" — Speaker 1, 02:35, demo data
2024 · #
"Image... Spend ~$402K, ROAS 3.73" — Speaker 1, 02:41, demo data
2024 · #
"prime... Spend ~$405K, ROAS ~3.93, Thumbstop ~8.07%" — Speaker 1, 05:26, demo data
2024 · #
"wheeljack... Spend ~$286K, ROAS ~3.96, Thumbstop ~8.76%" — Speaker 1, 05:26, demo data
2024 · #
"Bumblebee... Spend ~$228K, ROAS ~4.03, Thumbstop ~9.72%" — Speaker 1, 05:28, demo data
2024 · #
"Bumblebee breakdown: Total spend $227K, Avg ROAS 4.03, 169 ad groups" — Speaker 1, 05:50, demo data
2024 · #

Everything referenced on-screen and by name

People mentioned (excluding speakers listed above)

Brands / companies referenced

Tools / products referenced (excluding Motion)

External frameworks / concepts cited

5 ads referenced

Show all 5 ads with extraction details
Ad #1 — Three lit candles
Unknown brand (demo account) ·Video ·05:53
Duration shown in this video
2 seconds
Hook (first 3 sec)
A close-up shot of three lit white candles.
Product / pitch
Scented candles for home ambiance.
Key on-screen text
c:Holidays all year around_f:Video...
Key spoken lines
None used
Visual style
Polished, high-fi
CTA / offer (if shown)
None used
Narrative arc
None observable
Why shown in this video
Shown as a thumbnail example of a top-performing ad in the Motion software's "Bumblebee breakdown" report.
Speaker's take
The speaker is explaining how to drill down into the individual ads that make up a performance group.
Ad #2 — Flowers and candle
Unknown brand (demo account) ·Video ·05:53
Duration shown in this video
2 seconds
Hook (first 3 sec)
A shot of a lit candle next to a vase of pink and purple flowers.
Product / pitch
Scented candles for home ambiance.
Key on-screen text
c:Lavender halways_f:Video...
Key spoken lines
None used
Visual style
Polished, high-fi
CTA / offer (if shown)
None used
Narrative arc
None observable
Why shown in this video
Shown as a thumbnail example of a top-performing ad in the Motion software's "Bumblebee breakdown" report.
Speaker's take
The speaker is explaining how to drill down into the individual ads that make up a performance group.
Ad #3 — Plant and candle
Unknown brand (demo account) ·Dynamic Creative ·05:53
Duration shown in this video
2 seconds
Hook (first 3 sec)
A shot of a houseplant in a pot next to a lit candle.
Product / pitch
Scented candles for home ambiance.
Key on-screen text
c:Gifts_f:Carousel_c:NEW_lp:P...
Key spoken lines
None used
Visual style
Polished, high-fi
CTA / offer (if shown)
None used
Narrative arc
None observable
Why shown in this video
Shown as a thumbnail example of a top-performing ad in the Motion software's "Bumblebee breakdown" report.
Speaker's take
The speaker is explaining how to drill down into the individual ads that make up a performance group.
Ad #4 — Dining table setting
Unknown brand (demo account) ·Image ·05:53
Duration shown in this video
2 seconds
Hook (first 3 sec)
An overhead shot of a fully set dining table with food, plates, and glasses.
Product / pitch
Home goods or food-related products.
Key on-screen text
c:Gifts_f:image_c:NEW_lp:P...
Key spoken lines
None used
Visual style
Polished, high-fi, lifestyle
CTA / offer (if shown)
None used
Narrative arc
None observable
Why shown in this video
Shown as a thumbnail example of a top-performing ad in the Motion software's "Bumblebee breakdown" report.
Speaker's take
The speaker is explaining how to drill down into the individual ads that make up a performance group.
Ad #5 — Candle lighting video
Unknown brand (demo account) ·Video ·07:03
Duration shown in this video
5 seconds
Hook (first 3 sec)
A hand with a lit match enters the frame from the right and lights a white candle sitting on a table next to a book.
Product / pitch
Scented candle for home ambiance.
Key on-screen text
None used
Key spoken lines
None used
Visual style
Polished, high-fi
CTA / offer (if shown)
None used
Narrative arc
Hook only (lighting the candle).
Why shown in this video
To demonstrate how to preview individual ad assets within a group breakdown in the Motion software.
Speaker's take
"I can really easily just click on this to start playing the assets directly in here too. And this is our demo account, so content isn't very engaging..."

10 slides, in order

Show all 10 slides with full slide content
Slide #1 — Motion Plus One Dashboard - Comparative Analysis
screenshot-with-annotations ·00:02, revisited 08:00, 09:32 ·Play
Title / header text
Untitled
Body content
• Left Sidebar Menu: Overview, Creative highlights, Opportunities, Create report, Folders (Reports, For Creative Team, For Media Buyers, Iterations Needed, Inspiration for Iterations, For Client, Inspiration for Iterations, For Upper Management, Meta Reports (Purchase), TikTok Templates (Purcha...), Youtube Reports, Tagging examples, Iterations Needed, Iteration Opps, Launch Analysis, Influencer/UGC, Workshop Reports, Quarterly Copy, Last Week Reports, archived reports, Weekly Insights). • Main Content Header: Motion Plus One, Untitled, Updated 1h ago, Save. • Metrics: Spend, Impressions, + Add metric.
Embedded data (charts/tables)
Bar Chart
• Title: Spend / Impressions • Y-axis (left): Spend ($0, $100K, $200K, $300K, $400K) • Y-axis (right): Impressions (0, 11M, 22.2M, 33.3M, 44.4M) • X-axis categories: Optimus Prime, Wheeljack, Bumblebee, Megatron, Skywarp • Data points (approximate): • Optimus Prime: Spend ~$405K, Impressions ~45M • Wheeljack: Spend ~$286K, Impressions ~31.8M • Bumblebee: Spend ~$228K, Impressions ~29M • Megatron: Spend ~$228K, Impressions ~25M • Skywarp: Spend ~$184K, Impressions ~20.7M
Table
• Columns: Spend, Impressions, CPM, Link clicks, CPC (all), CTR (all) • Rows: • Optimus Prime (275 ads): $404,818.1, 45,417,764, $8.91, 1,415,274, $0.29, 3.11% • Wheeljack (306 ads): $285,540.2, 31,782,548, $8.98, 993,930, $0.29, 3.14% • Bumblebee (289 ads): $227,738.8, 24,771,110, $9.19, 795,480, $0.28, 3.23% • Megatron (318 ads): $227,578.7, 24,686,424, $9.22, 827,330, $0.28, 3.31% • Skywarp (312 ads): $183,784.1, 20,877,510, $8.89, 667,058, $0.27, 3.25%
Annotations / visual emphasis
None used
Reveal state
None used
Re-reference
At 08:00, the table is shown with different data. At 09:32, the chart is shown again, this time automatically generated by grouping by "Influencer".
Speaker's framing
"If you ever asked yourself the question, which ad format works better for us, or which creator is working better for us... that's what we're going to be diving into today, which is essentially how to uncover creative trends."
Slide #2 — Create new report modal
screenshot-with-annotations ·01:16 ·Play
Title / header text
Create new report
Body content
• Top performing: See which creatives are performing best • Comparative analysis: Compare multiple sets of creatives against one another • Launch analysis: Analyze creative performance during the testing phase • Winning combinations: Identify top ad combinations using naming conventions
Embedded data (charts/tables)
None used
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
The cursor clicks on "Comparative analysis".
Reveal state
None used
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"...we'll be exploring comparative reports."
Slide #3 — Blank Comparative Analysis Report
screenshot-with-annotations ·01:20 ·Play
Title / header text
Untitled
Body content
• "Type a description for this report" • "Define groups of ads to compare" dropdown. • Date range selector: "Last 14 days Nov 15 - 28, 2024" • "Add filter" button. • Main area: "Groups not defined. Define groups to analyze your ads performance" with a dashed arrow pointing to the "Define groups" dropdown.
Embedded data (charts/tables)
None used
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
A dashed arrow points from the text "Define groups to analyze your ads performance" to the "Define groups of ads to compare" dropdown.
Reveal state
None used
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"Comparative reports, like I was saying, is going to allow you to pull those higher level grouped views of how does one group of ads do in comparison to another group."
Slide #4 — Building Image vs. Video Groups
screenshot-with-annotations ·01:44 ·Play
Title / header text
Untitled
Body content
• Group 1: Image, where Ad type is Image (474 ads) • Group 2: Video, where Ad type is Video (498 ads)
Embedded data (charts/tables)
Bar Chart
• Metrics: Spend, Impressions • Categories: Video, Image • Data (approximate): • Video: Spend ~$589K, Impressions ~65.8M • Image: Spend ~$402K, Impressions ~44.6M
Table
• Columns: Spend, Impressions, CPM, Link clicks, CPC (all), CTR (all) • Rows: • Video (498 ads): $588,666.6, 65,769,424, $8.95, 2,135,658, $0.28, 3.22% • Image (474 ads): $401,601.1, 44,602,320, $9.00, 1,378,916, $0.29, 3.11% • Net Results: $990,268.22, 110,371,744, Avg $8.97, 3,514,574, Avg $0.28, 3.18%
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
The process of selecting filters (Ad setup -> Ad type -> Image/Video) is shown.
Reveal state
The groups and chart are built step-by-step.
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"So let's start with that really quick example of image versus video."
Slide #5 — Adding ROAS Metric
screenshot-with-annotations ·02:18 ·Play
Title / header text
Untitled
Body content
• Group 1: Image, where Ad type is Image (474 ads) • Group 2: Video, where Ad type is Video (498 ads)
Embedded data (charts/tables)
Bar Chart
• Metrics: Spend, ROAS • Categories: Video, Image • Data (approximate): • Video: Spend ~$589K, ROAS ~4.25 • Image: Spend ~$402K, ROAS ~3.73
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
The user removes the "Impressions" metric and adds the "ROAS" metric.
Reveal state
The chart updates to reflect the new metric.
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"If we're a purchase focused, I could go ahead and select ROAS or CPA..."
Slide #6 — Line Chart View
chart ·02:56 ·Play
Title / header text
Untitled
Body content
• Group 1: Image, where Ad type is Image • Group 2: Video, where Ad type is Video
Embedded data (charts/tables)
Line Chart (Weekly)
• Metrics: Spend, ROAS • Y-axis (left): Spend ($800.00, $1K, $1.2K, $1.4K, $1.6K) • Y-axis (right): ROAS (4.38, 5.29, 6.20, 7.13, 8.04) • X-axis: Dates from Aug 31 to Nov 16 in weekly increments. • Two lines are plotted, one for Image (pink) and one for Video (purple).
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
The user switches from bar chart to line chart view and changes the date range and aggregation (Daily to Weekly).
Reveal state
The chart type and data aggregation are changed.
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"Now, another fun view you guys have access to within comparative reports is the line chart view. This one is going to show you changes over a period of time..."
Slide #7 — Creator Comparison with Thumbstop
screenshot-with-annotations ·05:16 ·Play
Title / header text
Untitled
Body content
• Group 1: Bumblebee, where Ad name contains Bumblebee (289 ads) • Group 2: prime, where Ad name contains prime (275 ads) • Group 3: wheeljack, where Ad name contains wheeljack (306 ads)
Embedded data (charts/tables)
Bar Chart
• Metrics: Spend, ROAS, Thumbstop • Categories: prime, wheeljack, Bumblebee • Data (approximate): • prime: Spend ~$405K, ROAS ~3.93, Thumbstop ~8.07% • wheeljack: Spend ~$286K, ROAS ~3.96, Thumbstop ~8.76% • Bumblebee: Spend ~$228K, ROAS ~4.03, Thumbstop ~9.72%
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
The user adds the "Thumbstop" metric to the chart, resulting in three bars per category.
Reveal state
The chart updates to show the third metric.
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"Now, aside from just ROAS... we might also want to dive into other metrics. So a great example of this would be which ads are capturing attention a little bit better."
Slide #8 — Ad Breakdown View
screenshot-with-annotations ·05:50 ·Play
Title / header text
Bumblebee breakdown
Body content
• Summary stats: Total spend $227K, Avg ROAS 4.03, # ad groups 169. • Section: "Top ads by Motion metrics" • Table of individual ads with thumbnails, names, Spend, and ROAS.
Embedded data (charts/tables)
• Motion Metrics Scores: • Hook score: 88 • Watch score: 82 • Click score: 98 • Convert score: 83
Embedded examples
• Thumbnails of various ads (candles, flowers, home decor, table setting).
Annotations / visual emphasis
The user clicks on the "Ad breakdown" link for the "Bumblebee" group to navigate to this view.
Reveal state
None used
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"And one thing you will of course want to do is dive into the individual group just to get a little bit of a deeper insight."
Slide #9 — Adding a Global Filter
screenshot-with-annotations ·07:14 ·Play
Title / header text
Untitled
Body content
• Global Filter: Campaign name contains prospecting • Group 1: Bumblebee, where Ad name contains Bumblebee (141 ads) • Group 2: prime, where Ad name contains prime (113 ads) • Group 3: wheeljack, where Ad name contains wheeljack (154 ads)
Embedded data (charts/tables)
Bar Chart (Filtered)
• Metrics: Spend, ROAS, Thumbstop • Categories: prime, wheeljack, Bumblebee • Data (approximate): • prime: Spend ~$142K, ROAS ~1.68% • wheeljack: Spend ~$116K, ROAS ~1.31% • Bumblebee: Spend ~$84.9K, ROAS ~4.13%
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
The user adds a global filter for "Campaign name contains prospecting".
Reveal state
The chart and group counts update to reflect the filter.
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"Within these groups as well too, just know that we also have the global filter option, which will essentially add like a larger filter to the entire group."
Slide #10 — Naming Convention Setup
screenshot-with-annotations ·09:02 ·Play
Title / header text
Naming convention
Body content
• Manage how your ads are categorized. Define properties based on your naming conventions to organize your ad data effectively. • Meta: 7 properties • TikTok: Not defined yet
Edit property (Influencer)
• Property name: Influencer • Identifier: i: • Examples of values detected: Optimus Prime, Bumblebee, Skywarp, Wheeljack, Megatron
Embedded data (charts/tables)
None used
Embedded examples
None used
Annotations / visual emphasis
The user navigates through Workspace settings to the Naming convention page and shows the setup for the "Influencer" property.
Reveal state
None used
Re-reference
None used
Speaker's framing
"And one last thing to point out here... is within your naming conventions, if you include identifiers, that's going to unlock a lot of automation."

Verbatim transcript, speaker-tagged

Read the complete 56-paragraph transcript

Speaker 1: > [VISUAL: Motion logo on a black background. The logo is three overlapping purple rectangles next to the word "Motion" in white.] If you ever asked yourself the question, which ad format works better for us, or which creator is working better for us, or maybe even based on stage of funnel, what specific format works well within that stage, that's what we're going to be diving into today, which is essentially how to uncover creative trends.

A woman appears in a picture-in-picture in the bottom right corner of the screen. The main screen shows the Motion Plus One software dashboard. A bar chart compares "Spend" (purple) and "Impressions" (pink) for five ad groups: Optimus Prime, Wheeljack, Bumblebee, Megatron, and Skywarp. Below the chart is a table with detailed metrics for each group.

Speaker 1: So, diving into an individual ad is great. It's going to let you see which individual ads are working, what specifically is working or not working about it. But what we also want to do is pull those holistic trends, the grouped views where we can decide what direction to lean into based on those results. Meaning, do images holistically work better than videos holistically? Does creator one work better holistically than creator two holistically? So seeing those higher level insights can really guide us on what direction to take with what creatives to make and lean into.

Speaker 1: Now, if you haven't yet watched the session on naming convention, I would recommend going there. It's going to give you that high level view of what to include within naming, which will then unlock how we can pull these different insights within Motion.

Speaker 1: But if you've already done so, let's go ahead and deep dive into Motion and how we can start pulling out those insights. Like you would have seen in that session, we'll be exploring comparative reports.

The speaker's cursor moves to the left sidebar and clicks on "Create report". A pop-up appears titled "Create new report" with four options. The cursor hovers over the second option, "Comparative analysis".

Speaker 1: Comparative reports, like I was saying, is going to allow you to pull those higher level grouped views of how does one group of ads do in comparison to another group.

A confirmation pop-up appears asking to leave the page. The speaker clicks "OK". A new, blank report screen appears. The cursor clicks on the "Define groups of ads to compare" dropdown.

Speaker 1: So you can click this button here and select create custom group, which is where we're going to be able to determine which groups we want to see.

The speaker clicks "Create custom groups". The view changes to show two empty group fields. The speaker clicks "Add filter" on the first group.

Speaker 1: So let's start with that really quick example of image versus video. Nice thing naming convention wise, this is actually one of the pieces you don't need within naming. Um, we do automatically pull it through the API. So let's start with that one.

The speaker navigates the filter dropdowns: Ad setup -> Ad type -> is -> Image. She clicks "Apply".

Speaker 1: So under ad setup, ad type, we could do group one is image versus ad setup, ad type, group two is video.

The speaker sets up the second group with the filter "Ad type is Video" and clicks "Apply". The report populates with a bar chart comparing "Video" and "Image" based on "Spend" and "Impressions".

Speaker 1: So now we have our two different groups, images versus videos, and we can begin to deep dive and explore which is working better for us right now. I just have last 14 days selected, but feel free to select longer date ranges as needed. But we can see we've put a lot more spend behind video versus image. Now, we might also want to see, well, which format type is returning back better for us.

The speaker clicks on the "Impressions" metric tag, which opens a search box. She types "roas" and selects "ROAS".

Speaker 1: If we're purchase focused, I could go ahead and select ROAS or CPA, slash if you're app install focused, you could do cost per app install, whatever it might be. Feel free to swap metrics as needed.

The bar chart updates to show "Spend" and "ROAS" for the "Video" and "Image" groups. The ROAS for Video is 4.25 and for Image is 3.73.

Speaker 1: But in this case, we can see, you want to know what, we're putting a lot more spend behind video, but it is returning back better for us actually. So that's great. That's exactly what we would want to see. Now, if we notice that images were actually returning back a lot better, that might flag to us that, ooh, we maybe need to lean a little bit more into image content and decide if we want to launch some new images this next batch of creatives.

Speaker 1: Now, another fun view you guys have access to within comparative reports is the line chart view.

The speaker clicks the line chart icon in the top right of the chart area.

Speaker 1: This one is going to show you changes over a period of time, which can be really interesting. Say for example, maybe we are trying a new different style of video format and we want to see does video actually start working better for us over time if we noticed it wasn't working well for us during like certain months that we were testing it. So you can do line chart view to see that difference over time. Now, this one is just set to a daily view, but say we go back last 90 days, for example, then I could swap to a weekly option.

The speaker changes the date range to "Last 90 days" and the time interval from "Daily" to "Weekly". The line chart updates.

Speaker 1: And then we can see week over week how has that been changing. Now, this is our demo account, so it's going to look a little funky with the data, but hopefully you'll notice a bit of a smoother curve or change in how those different groups are changing over time. This one's just showing spend, but I could swap to see like return wise how is that one shifting over time, um, or any metric at all that you want to load in here. But looking at that line chart view is a really fun one to spot trends.

Speaker 1: Another great example of this is maybe you sell a couple of different products and we notice within certain seasons of the year, product A really spikes up in sales, but then it starts to dip and product B takes over and that's the one that we are noticing we're getting a lot more sales for. So seasonal changes too, again, really fun to pull in that line chart view and see in this type of a view. Now, if you also go back longer, like a 365 window, you will also have the option to choose monthly.

The speaker changes the date range to "Last 365 days" and the time interval to "Monthly".

Speaker 1: So again, making those lines a little bit smoother to see how are those trending over a longer period of time.

Speaker 1: Now, another example might be we want to look at different creators and how each different creator is working in comparison to one another. Let's go ahead and build out a report for that.

The speaker creates a new comparative report and selects "Create custom groups".

Speaker 1: So I could click to create a custom group and I could say add name, because this would be included within your ad naming conventions. Like I said, watch that session if you haven't. But maybe ad name contains Bumblebee as our first group, which is our first creator, versus our second group, which is Optimus Prime. So I'll just put prime in here, versus our third group being Wheeljack.

The speaker sets up three groups using the "Ad name contains" filter for "Bumblebee", "prime", and "wheeljack".

Speaker 1: So anything within our naming conventions essentially, we can start to create these groups to then pull those higher level views on how these different groups are doing in comparison to each other. Now, aside from just ROAS, is it returning back well or not for us, we might also want to dive into other metrics.

The speaker changes the "Impressions" metric to "ROAS", then clicks "Add metric" and adds "Thumbstop". The bar chart updates to show three bars for each group.

Speaker 1: So a great example of this would be which ads are capturing attention a little bit better. And Bumblebee is the one that's actually capturing attention really, really well for us, surprisingly. So they're returning really well, they're capturing attention well, we're not putting as much spend. So directionally, do we hire Bumblebee to make more content because we are seeing some success here.

Speaker 1: And one thing you will of course want to do is dive into the individual group just to get a little bit of a deeper insight.

The speaker clicks the "ad breakdown" link for the Bumblebee group in the table below the chart.

Speaker 1: So if you click into ad breakdown, that's where you're going to be able to see, for example, which ads are popping up under the group for Bumblebee.

The screen changes to the "Bumblebee breakdown" report, showing top ads and a list of individual ads.

Speaker 1: Do we notice one ad had $100,000 worth of spend and all the rest had a thousand? Do we just have like one extremely, um, high scaling asset that's becoming a winner within that group, but it's kind of taking over a lot of that data, or do we notice a nice, um, spread of ads that are also doing really well. So as you're, you know, diving into that and exploring it a little bit more, just also be sure to deep dive into what is happening within the group itself and if there's any anomalies within the group. You can go ahead and create a top performing report.

The speaker clicks the "Create Top Performing Report" button.

Speaker 1: That's going to let you deep dive into the individual ads that are a part of that group. So just like this example for Bumblebee, and I go over to card view, I'm going to be able to see what is happening within these groups and deep dive into it a little bit more.

The speaker navigates back to the comparative report.

Speaker 1: Now going back into this report, if you don't want to create that top performing, just know you can also start analyzing the previews here as well. So if we did notice, for example, Bumblebee does a really great job capturing attention, I can really easily just click on this to start playing the assets directly in here too.

The speaker clicks the play icon on a video thumbnail in the ad breakdown view. A small video player pops up and plays a video of a hand lighting a candle.

Speaker 1: And this is our demo account, like I said, so content isn't very engaging, but hopefully you have a lot more engaging content you can pull some inspiration on. But again, just a really nice way to dive in a little bit deeper to the insights to flesh out the insight that you found.

Speaker 1: Within these groups as well too, just know that we also have the global filter option, which will essentially add like a larger filter to the entire group. So maybe I wanted to see based on the different creators we're working with, which one is specifically working as part of our prospecting campaign and I don't want to look within our retargeting campaign, let's just say. I can easily throw on that global filter for prospecting.

The speaker clicks "Add filter" at the top of the report and sets a filter for "Campaign name contains prospecting".

Speaker 1: Or maybe we sell a bunch of different products and I want to dive in and see which creator works with a specific product because we know we're going into the season of that product and I want to figure out which creator to hire that's doing a really great job promoting that. You can also throw it on as an example there. So global filters will allow you to dive in even deeper.

Speaker 1: And one last thing to point out here, which was mentioned in that other session with naming too, is within your naming conventions, if you include identifiers, that's going to unlock a lot of automation.

The speaker shows a table view of ads. The ad names have a structured format, e.g., "c:Scented with love_f:Video_o:50OFF_lp:PDP_i:Optimus Prime".

Speaker 1: So like you saw in our session today, we clicked to add group, add group, add group, and then we continued to manually add every single one based on the ad name or ad set name or campaign name containing a certain thing. What we can start to do instead is automate a lot of this. So to give you an example of what I would mean, here are our different ad names within our demo account. We use I colon as an identifier to say that I colon means influencer. And you can see next to Optimus Prime, we have I colon, next to Wheeljack, we have I colon, next to Bumblebee, we have I colon. It's something consistent in front of the naming to identify what that specific thing is. You can use anything, so it could literally say INF for influencer and use a dash instead of a colon. That doesn't matter, you just need to have some kind of consistency in front. Same with O colon meaning offer for us and C colon meaning concept.

The speaker navigates to Workspace settings -> Naming convention -> Meta -> Edit property for "Influencer". The settings show the property name is "Influencer" and the identifier is "i:".

Speaker 1: With that identifier piece in front, what you can set up within Motion is under naming conventions, you can go ahead and add a brand new property and I could for example, look for I colon. In this case, I already have it pre-built out, so I'll show you how it looks. But I said I colon and I titled it influencer, and now our system is finding all of those different influencers. But you can do this for any element within naming. Where this becomes really nice is when it comes to creating that comparative report, all I have to do is select the option from the dropdown there, and it's going to keep this up to date if I work with new influencers over time or I'm trying new different hooks or I'm testing out different kinds of messaging or whatever it might be, you're going to have your comparative report pre-built and automated, which is really nice.

The speaker creates a new comparative report and, from the "Define groups of ads to compare" dropdown, selects "Influencer". The report automatically populates with a bar chart comparing all the influencers.

Speaker 1: So that is a quick run through of how to pull creative trends. So we know which direction to lean into, what kind of direction is working, what isn't working, and how do we want to structure our next batch of creatives based on the learnings that we're finding within here. And just remember, you can pull these higher level trends as long as we're including it in any element of the naming convention, meaning ad name, ad set name, or campaign name, you can start to pull these higher level views.

Motion logo on a black background.